The concept of immunity is deeply fascinating. While it serves a vital role in protecting individuals from arbitrary prosecution, there are concerns that it can also be misused to shield the guilty from accountability. This raises a critical question: does immunity, intended as a safeguard against oppression, ultimately become a shield against just

Presidential immunity, a concept deeply inscribed in the American legal structure, often sparks intense debate. Proponents argue that it's essential for effective governance, shielding presidents from frivolous lawsuits and allowing them to focus their energies to national concerns. Conversely, critics contend that it creates an unequal playing fie